After learning about the Harm of yesterday and Healing today, forming an Acknowledgment statement and an apology, the next step is being in enough of a relationship with a tribal group to share this work and negotiate on how it could be accepted. Acting in solidarity is a way to begin to establish this relationship. It also is the framework for finding ways to make amends in order to move forward together. It is not easy, quick or simple. It takes long-term, unwavering committment.
To begin the journey of acting in solidarity, identify the indigenous group closest to where you live. It most often won’t be a recognized tribe but a smaller group. Find out if the group is considered by other established tribal groups to be legitimate. (Read the section on appropriation which explains some of the behavior that could make this confusing.)
Once a group has been identified the primary skill in acting in solidarity is patience and being able to pay attention. What impact from the external, non-indigenous community concerns THEM the most? Note: asking outright often isn’t the best way to get this information. Not drawing attention to yourself (you will be noticed) but rather quietly listening and observing, even though it takes time, can reveal the information you are seeking.
One simple way of starting is to look for those concerns that are national in scope. In the 1980-2000 non-indigenous people could join the fight for Leonard Peltier. There were marches and vigils, letter writing campaigns and fasting that allies could join in with their local Tribal group. Paying attention though we can see that today very few tribal groups are actively involved. They have their reasons which those outside the Tribe do not need to know.
One easy and effective way to demonstrate solidarity is by donating money (or better land; see Sovereignty page). If you do decide to physically join an action or demonstration though, make sure you are as inconspicuous as possible. Learn what is hoped and expected and especially what is unacceptable by observation and paying attention. No matter how quiet you are know that you will be noticed. Even seemingly little things, like entering a circle by moving counter clockwise can be important. It is also critical that you provide for your own physical needs; you will not be acting in solidarity if you become a burden.
Finally, it is good for non-Indigenous people to know that flirting or engaging in intimate relationships with a Tribal member can substantially and permanently alienate you from others in the Tribe.
There are a large number of ways to act in solidarity.
One way is to look for images of indigenous people which are used by the doninate society such as the Massachussetts State seal or the use of offensive place names, imagery and language. one of the most egregious is the term “redskin.” See GRIM COMMERCE: SCALPS, BOUNTIES, on the Legal Genocide page, (half way down).
A major action that has been active for decades is the “Not our Mascot” protests.
Native American Mascots are Dehumanizing and Need to be Banned
Excerpt from the article…
A s a Native American woman, I am regularly confronted with mascot images that dehumanize Native Americans as hostile and aggressive. These images are usually cartoonish depictions of our traditional dress and lifestyle from the 1800s. …
On a daily basis, American Indian youth experience negative stereotypes and microaggressions harming their self-esteem according to a 2015 study published by Utah State University psychologists Merill L. Jones and Renee V. Galliher. These same youth have the highest rates of suicide, alcohol related deaths, and the lowest quality of life in the nation. …
Where do Native American youth learn to think of themselves in less than positive ways? The most prevalent places occur in neighborhood school systems and in mainstream sports with derogatory “Indian” mascots that are imposed on Native people against their will.
Change the Mascot
Excerpt from website…
Here you will find a huge amount of resources. “Change the Mascot is a national campaign to end the use of the racial slur “r*dskins” as the mascot and name of the NFL team in Washington, D.C. Launched by the Oneida Indian Nation, the campaign calls upon the NFL and Commissioner Roger Goodell to do the right thing and bring an end the use of the racial epithet. View Our Fact Sheet
Read: Native Americans Unite to Speak Out Against Racially Offensive Mascot Name
View: Ten facts omitted by the Washington D.C. team’s new PR website
Read: Letters to Twitter, Google and Facebook from the Change the Mascot Campaign
Editorial: “A Change Will Come” by Oneida Nation Representative Ray Halbritter”
They also have a “History of Progress” from 1968 – 2020
So think about the sports teams in your area looking especially at High school teams. What work does your community need to do?
Below are some examples of responses to small acts of solidarity
click to view larger images
There are many other ways as well. One of the simplest is writing letters to the Editor on something critical that effects the indigenous people in your community. As said before, everything is local so find out the actions of resistance that members of your local tribe is engaged in and with humility and meekness see if outside participation would be acceptable. Below are some examples. There are some actions in which indigenous communities all across the country are engaged. Although efforts have died down considerable, decades ago one such action was for the release of Leonard Peltier. Today the DAPL (The Dakota Access) pipeline and Standing Rock.
Individual actions can make a difference. Some, like writing letters to the editor, can be a tiny form of expressing solidarity. Although small, one after the next, after the next will build into something worthwhile. Letters to the Editor of Cape Cod Times Who’s...
This role play helps students recognize the issues at stake in the historic struggle of the Standing Rock Sioux to block construction of the Dakota Access oil pipeline. Before launching the role play, we wanted to give students a visceral and visual sense of the resistance under way along the Missouri River.
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) is an international instrument adopted by the United Nations on September 13, 2007, to enshrine (according to Article 43) the rights that “constitute the minimum standards for the survival, dignity and well-being of the indigenous peoples of the world.”
Among other things, UAINE is a Native-led organization which fights back on such issues as the racism of the Pilgrim mythology perpetuated in Plymouth and the U.S. government’s assault on poor people. Since 1970, Native Americans and our supporters have gathered at noon on Cole’s Hill in Plymouth to commemorate a National Day of Mourning on the US thanksgiving holiday.
One example of asking people to prayerfully consider appropriate responses and support for the indigenous protectors at Standing Rock. We also urged people to look at white supremacist attitudes that most of us of European descent carry unconsciously.
Sisters of the Light was a women’s multi-cultural spiritual group int he 1990’s. Among other things, they would present stories of six primarily Wampanoag, and Quaker women from Cape Cod history one of them being abolitionist Quaker, Lucretia Mott.
Intention V Outcome
When intending to stand in solidarity with Indigenous people it is important to know about the highly controversial issues that Native People grapple with that it best for a non-Native person to not bring up or engage with. If you have an established relationship with an individual who tries to draw you into a conversation the best way to respond is say something to the effect that “I know you have the best intentions for your people in your heart and will do the right thing” period. If they invite you to stand in solidarity with them and you decide to join them, know that you might become a persona non gratis with a different indigenous community or even with a faction of the tribal group of your friend. One example of such an issue is gambling casinos.
Many things are complicated for non-indigenous people when interacting with different tribal groups or individuals. Terms can be especially problematic. Some people find the term “Indian” offensive while others embrace it and many prefer “Indigenous People” to “Native American”. Almost all feel that the proper way to address identity is only with the name of the local group such as Wampanoag, and differentiate between Aquinnah, Mashpee ot small subsets.
As said before, everything is local. Some terms though are a landmine for offense. One such term is “Squa.” Many indigenous people from North America feel this is a highly offensive term related to female genitalia. However the MacArthur Fellowship and one of USA TODAY’s Women of the Century Wampanoag linguist Jessie Little Doe Baird says:
“The answer really depends upon who is asked. Strictly speaking, the semantics of the word simply mean, ‘female’, ‘woman’. Ushq(â) was occasionally used a separate word but it is generally added either as a suffix or a prefix denoting, ‘female’. An equivalent in English would be the suffix –ess, such as in the words,
In colonial times, Pilgrims heard the pattern in words that were spoken in Wampanaog and recognized the sound ‘ushqâ’ or ‘shqâ’ when women were being discussed. They took the sound by itself to mean, ‘woman’ and since they did not respect their own women and used the English word, ‘woman’ as a derogatory term at times, they carried on the same practice with the sound, ‘ushqâ’. This does not mean that the sound is a bad word! The Wampanoag language does not contain and swear words or derogatory terms for women. The worst insult I have ever come across referring to a woman in any way in my twenty years of research is a term in Wampanoag that translates to, ‘your mother only has one eye’.”
Then there are some issues that it is vital that you not engage on the topic in anyway, shape or form. Trying to be helpful, hoping to be a positive force, or feeling led to offer your opinion or perspective might be with the best intentions but the outcome will only result in mucking things up further and cause harm. No good can come of it! One such issue is “Blood Quantum”. FYI, blood quantum was initially a system that the federal government placed onto tribes in an effort to limit their citizenship.
So What Exactly Is ‘Blood Quantum’?
Excerpt from the article…
If you’re Native American there’s a good chance that you’ve thought a lot about blood quantum — a highly controversial measurement of the amount of “Indian blood” you have. It can affect your identity, your relationships and whether or not you — or your children — may become a citizen of your tribe.
Blood quantum was initially a system that the federal government placed onto tribes in an effort to limit their citizenship. Many Native nations, including the Navajo Nation and the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, still use it as part of their citizenship requirements.article quote